The Dark

Product Information

John McGahern zeichnet seine Charaktere nicht schwarz oder weiß, sondern in vielen verschiedenen Schattierungen. So ist auch der Vater nicht nur der Schläger, auch wenn das sicherlich sein Handeln nicht rechtfertigt. He took the heavy leather strap he used for sharpening his razor from its nail on the side of the press.

The Dark - John McGahern - Google Books

Amongst Women (1990), Irish Times/Aer Lingus Literary Award (1991), GPA Award (1992), nominated for the Booker Prize (1990). Its reputation overwhelmed by the Irish Church's initially successful campaign to have it banned, this second novel by John McGahern is a characteristically superb look at the various fault lines in Irish society acting on the choices of a talented young student from a poor family. The reason they banned it (when they could still do such things) was not just its spine-chilling scene of the father, Mahoney's, sexual abuse of his own son, but the clear-eyed way in which McGahern breaks down the easy route being offered by the Church to essentially hoodwink promising students at a moment of weakness or doubt. Presenting the priesthood as a death in life - admittedly also the skewed view of this young and sexually inexperienced adolescent - was guaranteed not to appeal much to the Church. The novel itself, though, is so well-written and so often disturbing that we are forced to question many facets of power and its uncertain dance over time. Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 2020-08-28 05:07:32 Boxid IA1914603 Camera USB PTP Class Camera Collection_set printdisabled External-identifierTake it if you want and don’t take it if you don’t want. It’s your decision. I won’t have you blaming me for the rest of your life that the one chance you did get that I stood in your way. Do what you want to do.” MyHome.ie (Opens in new window) • Top 1000 • The Gloss (Opens in new window) • Recruit Ireland (Opens in new window) • Irish Times Training (Opens in new window) The 2015 Irish marriage referendum is all the more striking because it stands in contrast to the explicit and rigid ways that the Irish government imposed narrow conceptions of gender roles on the population in previous generations. The state’s power of prescriptive gendering was most prominently established in the Irish Constitution of 1937 ( Bunreacht na hÉireann), penned in near entirety by Éamon de Valera. The 1937 Constitution replaced the 1922 Constitution, which was written after the establishment of new Irish legislature following the Anglo-Irish Treaty. The 1937 constitution is widely viewed as a reactionary piece of legislation which projected the overt social agenda of the de Valera administration, and which paved the way for Ireland’s mid-twentieth century withdrawal from Western Europe’s main theatres of power while asserting Irish exceptionalism rooted in Catholic morality. The 1922 Constitution had intentionally avoided a sectarian bias in its language, as noted by J.J. Lee, a celebrated critic of de Valera’s oratory and rhetorical tactics. [15] By way of contrast, de Valera’s 1937 Constitution was a calculated “chipping away” of the 1922 document that described a privileged relationship between the State and the Catholic Church, and outlined in broad, conflationary terms Irish people’s loyalty to Nation and State and foregrounded an “ideal-type image of the Irish family as a loving haven of selfless accord.” [16] Amongst Women was filmed as a television mini-series in 1998, directed by Tom Cairns, and starring Tony Doyle as Moran. Yes, we’re in ‘miserable bloody Ireland’ territory, a place well explored in literature, but rarely so compellingly as in McGahern’s fiction. Here he gives us a young man trying to work out his future – to join his father’s farm, or seek a vocation in the priesthood, or even go to England. All this is not entirely his decision as he lives, like his sisters, under the dead hand of Mahoney, a great literary monster-father (“God, O God, such a misfortunate crowd of ignoramuses to be saddled with”– but “don’t you know I love you no matter what happens?”). The son gets a scholarship (“there wasn’t much rejoicing”) which gives Mahoney the opportunity to adopt his best stance: the bully-as-victim or, as we might now say, passive-aggressive.

The Dark - John McGahern - Google Books The Dark - John McGahern - Google Books

In particular, the State recognises that by her life within the home, woman gives to the State a support without which the common good cannot be achieved. dialectical reading of the gap that appeared between the revolutionary ethos of independent Irish identity formation, rooted in the principles of 1916 Rising and the Kevin and Candy: what is Amongst Women about? – a very good question, deserving of full consideration… Sadly as I read it two years ago and didn’t write a review (on the very good grounds that I was on honeymoon at the time), I can’t be terribly specific. But – Kevin – although Moran was a former IRA man, I don’t believe that this is a book which is about the Irish question, except insofar as it informs the character of Moran. I really do think that not to read even one McGahern means you’d be missing out. You would get through Amongst Women in a day anyway. The ideal Ireland that we would have, the Ireland that we dreamed of, would be the home of a people who valued material wealth only as a basis for right living, of a people who, satisfied with frugal comfort, devoted their leisure to the things of the spirit—a land whose countryside would be bright with cosy homesteads, whose fields and villages would be joyous with the sounds of industry, with the romping of sturdy children, the contest of athletic youths and the laughter of happy maidens, whose firesides would be forums for the wisdom of serene old age. The home, in short, of a people living the life that God desires that men should live. [23]The 1937 Constitution of the Irish Free State in no uncertain terms assumes and privileges the heterosexual two-parent household as the ideological extension of the paternal state. Article 41 of that constitution reads: Aber ganz entkommen kann er nicht. Nicht nur, dass er weitere Übergriffe durch einen Priester erleben muss, es scheint auch, als ob der Vater eine unsichtbare Fessel geschaffen hat, die ihn an sein altes Leben bindet. Und da sind auch noch die jüngeren Schwestern, die er beschützen will. In the third chapter of The Dark, scenes of sexual abuse escalate from mere implication to open explication. The chapter describes an incident between Mahoney and his son that, again, positions the two characters in multiple simultaneous genders. The events take place, again, in the “marital” space of the novel: the shared bed. The sexual, rather than practical aspects of this sleeping arrangement are established in the opening line of the chapter: “The worst was to have to sleep with him on the nights he wanted love.” [40] Young Mahoney projects an affect of dread of his father’s presence, fearing both the actions that take place at night and the consequences of resistance. The pattern of the elder Mahoney’s sexual abuse moves the boy through a progression of gendered positionings, the product of Mahoney’s redirecting their conversations so as to rationalize or ignore the more awful truths of their reality. Extended list of interviews, articles, and notices with and about John McGahern". Archived from the original on 14 November 2016 . Retrieved 13 November 2016.

John McGahern | Faber John McGahern | Faber

McGahern was a member of the Irish Arts honorary organisation Aosdána and won many other awards (including the Chevalier dans l' Ordre des Arts et des Lettres). He was visiting professor at many universities including Colgate University and the University of Notre Dame (United States), University of Victoria (Canada), Durham University (UK), UCD and NUI Galway (Ireland). His other awards included: Although nothing untoward happens, one is left with the distinct impression that the priest may have been grooming the child.Obituary:John McGahern". Archived from the original on 3 December 2017 . Retrieved 3 December 2017. The institution of marriage, which has traditionally been central to defining the state-sanctioned family unit, has only received serious revision to its overtly exclusionary heteronormativity within the past decade. The action of the state in permitting specific familial structures to survive and flourish is an intervention upon the physically and culturally reproductive processes that affirm and stabilize state power. The legal constructs that enable the state to define families through the institutions of marriage, adoption, fosterage and other non-biological configurations of individuals into recognized families reinforce Louis Althusser’s premise that the family is itself what he could call an “ideological state apparatus.” Althusser mentions in his footnotes to “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” that not only is the family an apparatus of state ideology, but it also has other “functions”, including its role in the reproduction of labor power and its production of a consumer base. [5] Althusser further articulates the ideological role, and constructedness, of the family unit in the ideological “interpellation” of the individual subject—the ideological and cultural socialization processes of raising a child. He asserts that “before its birth, the child is always-already a subject, appointed as a subject in and by the specific familial ideological configuration in which it is ‘expected’ once it has been conceived. I hardly need add that this familial ideological configuration is, in its uniqueness, highly structured, and that it is in this implacable and more or less ‘pathological’ (presupposing that any meaning can be assigned to that term) structure that the former subject-to-be will have to ‘find’ ‘its’ place, i.e. ‘become’ the sexual subject (boy or girl) which it already is in advance.” [6] Althusser’s words conjure another significant, complex function that the family unit—not only the nuclear family, but the entire constellation of persons who make up a familial set—performs as an apparatus of ideology: the familial household is the fundamental place of gendering children. a b Wroe, Nicolas (5 January 2002). "Ireland's Rural Elegist". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 November 2016 . Retrieved 17 August 2013.

The Guardian Figure in a landscape | Books | The Guardian

urn:lcp:dark0000mcga:epub:716fb18c-6ccc-4e35-a1e6-8586cd17256e Foldoutcount 0 Grant_report Arcadia #4281 Identifier dark0000mcga Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t7cs4zs6c Invoice 2089 Isbn 0571119913 He was also a farmer, although he liked to joke that it was the writing that kept the farm rather than the farming revenue allowing him to write. Goes on to write The Leavetaking (1975), The Pornographer (1979), Amongst Women (1990) and That They May Face the Rising Sun (2002). I never felt a victim,' he says, calmly. 'To be a victim is a failure of intelligence. One becomes responsible for one's own life, however difficult that life may be.' He closes his eyes, as if trying to catch a thought that is hovering on the edge of his consciousness, then says something that sheds fresh light on all his writing. 'No matter what happens to you, no matter how depressing the material, if it becomes depressing to write, or indeed, to read, it's no good. I firmly believe that unless the thing is understood it's useless, and that the understanding of it is a kind of joy. It's liberating.' The Collected Stories (1992), includes the three previous volumes of short stories (some of the stories appear in a slightly different form) and two additional stories – "The Creamery Manager" and "The Country Funeral". The former first appeared in Krina (1989).F-U-C-K is what you said, isn’t it? That profane and ugly word. Now do you think you can bluff your way out of it?” McGahern is evidently a gifted writer. Certain passages rang with an aching, almost histrionic urgency of plight. He couldn't have made it clearer that times were tough. And while I enjoyed the writing, the story was exhausting. Not just the prolonged depictions of sexual abuse and carnal sin at the hands of the clergymen. Our guide was an unconvincing tent pole for the plot. He simply existed, and though he attempts salvation, his indecision renders any message null and void. The 1937 Constitution offers a rhetorical exaltation of the role of mothers in Irish society, but it should be critiqued for what it is: institutional sexism that occludes women from participation in economic life in favor of birthing and raising children through an overt gendering of domestic space and duty. The duty of childbirth for “the common good” (41.2.1) is imagined as so completely encompassing of a woman’s life that its demands bar her from individual agency or even a sense of self, outside of her role within the state’s process of ideological reproduction. And, in agreement with Bourdieu’s theory, the state treats this arrangement as “natural” (41.1.1), overlooking the role and influence of the state on the very cultural formations that it describes, and bestowing upon the heterosexual two-parent household the symbolic profit of normality. [22] As the boy listens to this soothsaying in silent rage, he rejects the entire attempt at peacemaking rhetoric out of hand. In an internal monologue, he remains focused on the betrayals of abuse that have been repeatedly committed against him: The threat of consummation is ultimately revealed to be a bluff, as Mahoney slaps the arm of the leather chair loudly with his belt but leaves the boy untouched. Yet, the final image of Mahoney from the episode is his warning to the children of the beating that will follow their next transgression, before turning “to the naked boy before he left the room, his face still red and heated, the leather hanging dead in his hand.” [34] The phallic quality of the hanging leather belt, Mahoney’s flushed face and his disdainful glare confirm the aggressive violation that has occurred. Young Mahoney’s sister, Mona, remains perplexed as to the true nature of the encounter, asking, “Did he hit you at all?” [35] The boy cannot face this query: “The words opened such a floodgate that he had to hurry out of the room with the last of his clothes in his hands.” [36]