Kjver Sword Study Bible Giant Print Black Genuine Leather Indexed: King James Version Easy Read

Product Information

Thematic study guide with over three thousand margin notes covering more than ninety topics providing a years' worth of study that takes the reader from cover to cover of the Bible Jhn. 3:9 KJVER says, “Whosoever is born of God does not commit sin;” practice .................................................................................................. .......1 John 3:9 KJVER underlines the word “is” and the first letter of the word “ born” (“b") but does not explain anything in the footnote area. Maybe this explained at some place else in this translation. Not sure. But the real problem in 1 John 3:9 KJVER is the defined footnote for the word “commit.” It says that the word “commit” is defined as “practice.” Why is this a problem? Well, if Bob commits a crime, it does not mean that Bob is practicing that crime or making a habit of it. While it may be true that “practice” fits 1 John 3:9, I believe the real truth behind the word “commit” in reference to sin here is in regards to “justifying sin.” For a person can justify a little bit of sin in their life and not practice that sin and be condemned by God. The person who thinks they can sin a little or sin sometimes and be saved by God’s grace without any change in their life is the kind of person who has never known Christ or they fall under the truth of Ezekiel 18:24. For John is concerned with us confessing sin so as to be forgiven of sin (1 John 1:9), and in walking in the light so the blood of Jesus Christ cleanses us from all sin (1 John 1:7). So it’s having the right attitude towards sin. Are we going to justify sin, or are we going to battle and fight against it? Saying that we are to not practice sin opens the door to letting a little bit of sin on into our lives. This is not an okay thing with God. So the word “practice” is not a good definition for the word “commit” here in the footnote. ........................................................................................................................

Jms. 1:15 KJVER says, “Then when lust hath conceived, it brings forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, brings forth death.” full-grown .................................................................................................. Here we see the KJVER siding with the Modern Translation agenda again. In James 1:15, the KJVER defines the word “finished” as “full-grown.” This is because many Modern Translations say “fully grown” (instead of “finished”) in them. They are obviously different words here. If I finish a race, that does not mean I am fully grown. If I am an adult and fully grown, that does not mean my life is finished or over with, either.​ Of course, I firmly believe the King James Bible is God’s Word to the English-speaking world. I do not believe we will see another one translated on the same scope and with the same accuracy - all modern attempts at updating the language of the KJB have failed, as far as I have seen so far. Acts 25:19 KJV says, “But had certain questions against him of their own superstition, and of one Jesus, which was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.” concerning the Red Sea offends me, and I would love to see it removed. However, it is not in the text and therefore is not critical in my When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.Acts 8:9 KJVER says,“But there was a certain man, called Si´mon, which beforetime in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Sa-ma´ri-a,” magic - i.e. confused .................................................................................................. Acts 8:9 KJVER defines the word “bewitched” as “confused.” This is not exactly accurate. While I am sure someone who is under the influence of witchcraft is confused, that is not the heart of what the word “bewitched” means. It means to enchant, charm, place under a spell, and or to influence in a bad way usually by the use of witchcraft (Hence, it’s name). ........................................................................................................................ Study to show yourself approved to God, a workman that needs not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago–whether in the body I do not know, or whether out of the body I do not know, God knows–such a one was caught up to the third heaven.” I warn everyone who hears the prophetic words inn this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, 19 and if anyone takes away from the words in this prophetic book, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city described in this book. First off, I like this Sword bible for its Red Letter of the OT and the NT. However, it has errors, or should I say, changes to GOD's Word.

that does violence to this manuscript. I still hold that this is a good emendation and for those who desire a While the KJVER is less corrupt than other updated Modern KJVs, the footnotes here are a huge problem. They should have called this translation as: Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee his strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth. If there is a third heaven it is only logical there is a first and second heaven even if the bible doesn’t speak of them.

That is correct. It uses the traditional text or received text(TR). This is a well known and researched fact. It is also documented in the preface to the NKJV. An example of this, if we were to use the Law of First Mention (means, whenever a word is used for the first time in the bible, it has it’s greatest meaning). As you can imagine, Genesis is a wealth of “first mentions” and Chapter 1 of Genesis includes basic fundamental OT insight… nothing more than the first verse of Genesis 1.And Joseph’s master took him, and put him into the prison, a place where the king’s prisoners were bound: and he was there in the prison. N. (2011, July 28). Difference Between the KJV and the NKJV. Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects. http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/difference-between-the-kjv-and-the-nkjv/. Jhn. 5:8 KJVER says, “And there are three that bear witness in the earth, the S pirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.” .............................................................. .......... ......................................................................... ​It should be “spirit” not “Spirit” in 1 John 5:8. This should clearly not be capitalized. Only Jesus (the second person of the Godhead) is in agreement with the water and the blood, and not the Holy Spirit. The spirit agrees with the water and the blood. Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment. I think we all pretty much know that the texts used for the KJV have extra words/passages in them. It isn’t that a certain company is purposely removing these words or passages. So instead of making that claim at least be honest and comment on why the verses aren’t in the newer bibles and in the KJV and NKJV.

For every tree is known by its own fruit. For of thorns men do not gather figs, nor of a bramble bush gather they grapes.Acts 8:9 KJV says, “But there was a certain man, called Simon, which beforetime in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria,” I do not endorse changes in meaning, but changes that correct typos or update spelling are not demonic. The Bible was not written originally in English - but in Hebrew/Aramaic and Greek, then translated into English (and many other languages). If the English translation is faithful, but uses a different English word meaning the exact same thing, then it is not evil or a counterfeit. There were several English translations before the King James Bible was translated. Phil. 3:8 KJVER says, “for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ,” rubbish ......................................................................................................... Philippians 3:8 KJVER has the word “dung” defined as “rubbish” in the footnote. Poop and trash are both bad but poop is far worse. If a man pooped in his trashcan it would stink up the house. If he tried to put his trash down the toilet, it would clog it up. So no. They are not the same thing. Why do the translators here think they are the same thing? .............................................................................................................................. Matthew 5: 18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.