Intel® Core™ i9-10850K Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W

Product Information

Processors that support 64-bit computing on Intel® architecture require an Intel 64 architecture-enabled BIOS. First, setting the turbo ratio offset uses the default method of applying turbo ratios, meaning the frequency is determined by how many cores are active. The CPU ring is the interconnect on the CPU die which connects all parts of the CPU exchange data. It connects not only the CPU cores, but also the integrated graphics as well as the system agent. Via this interconnect the CPU cores can bring in fresh data to use for calculations as well as send data to other parts. If you're after better power efficiency, and thus a cooler and quieter machine that still has plenty of performance, turn to AMD's Ryzen line of chips. As you can see in our final two scatter charts, which measure the cumulativeamount of energy required to perform an x264 and x265 HandBrake workload, respectively, AMD still holds the unequivocal lead. Core i9-10850K Conclusion

When we do the same comparison for the Core i9-10850K however, the results are a bit more alarming.

Log in

We found that, in general, more cores do provide better performance in professional tools and when running multiple applications simultaneously. Một số sản phẩm có thể hỗ trợ Hướng dẫn mới của AES với cập nhật Cấu hình bộ xử lý, đặc biệt, i7-2630QM/i7-2635QM, i7-2670QM/i7-2675QM, i5-2430M/i5-2435M, i5-2410M/i5-2415M. Vui lòng liên hệ OEM để biết BIOS bao gồm bản cập nhật Cấu hình bộ xử lý mới nhất. After getting these results, it caused me to look more at the data underneath. In terms of power per core, when testing POV-Ray at full load the difference is about a watt per core or just under. What surprised me more was the frequency response as well as the core loading temperature. As expected, the 10850K pulls less power than the 10900K under full load, but we're looking at a roughly ~3% decrease in power consumption during the threaded AVX-heavy y-cruncher and HandBrake benchmarks.

It's rational to assume the availability issues stem from the 10900K's position at the top of the Comet Lake-S binning chart – it's a premium-binned chip and there simply might not be enough chips coming out of that fabs that land on the higher end of the binning distribution, making it hard to satisfy demand. The resulting price gouging only serves to widen the pricing gap between Intel's halo model and AMD's competing chips that already hold several key advantages. Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/processor-numbers.html for details. So in the end we had to settle for DDR4-4266 CL17. This is the same frequency as our XMP but with slightly better memory timings. All models support up to DDR5-4800 or DDR4-3200 memory, and 16 lanes of PCI Express 5.0 + 4 lanes of PCIe 4.0. First, we will increase the ring interconnect frequency. Then, we will also try some memory tuning.

Bộ nhớ đệm

The long story short is that Turbo Boost 2.0 allows the processor to increase the power consumption temporarily above the TDP rating to achieve higher performance. It manages this by accumulating “energy budget” during periods of idle time that can be deployed when necessary during periods of high load. Do note that the Memory Try It! function will also adjust voltages if necessary. For example, it will adjust the system memory voltage as well as the CPU System Agent voltage. Make sure to verify the settings and ensure you are comfortable with the raised voltages. In this new configuration, the frequency will be 5.4 GHz when up to 2 cores are active, 5.3 GHz when 3 cores are active, 5.1 GHz when 4 or 5 cores are active, and 5 Ghz when 6, 7, 8, 9, or all 10 cores are active. At first glance, it looks as if the Core i9-10850K consumes more power at any loading, but it is worth noting the power levels in the 80-100% region of the test, when we dip below 50 W. This is when we’re likely using 1 or 2 threads, and the power of the Core i9-10900K is much higher as a percentage here, likely because of the 5300 MHz setting. In our opinion, AMD's recent Ryzen XT lineup didn't change the performance calculus much. Outside of a few exceptions in professional workloads, those chips offer a negligible performance increase in most real-world applications, but at an increased price point. As such, we still recommend AMD's standard X-series models for the best value.