Left Is Not Woke

Product Information

I even agree with her on some points—loud music at restaurants is annoying—but the condescension doesn’t illuminate anything. She has written extensively on the philosophical history of evil, maintaining idealism in a rough world, the legacy of slavery and the holocaust, and why we should grow up.

The philosopher was himself a committed political activist deeply involved in the French prison-reform movement. Thus the panic of le wokeisme that has rocked France, where an adherence to universal principles over personal identity markers has long been regarded as the defining course of the nation. Subversive Thoughts for an Infantile Age ; Moral Clarity: A Guide for Grown-Up Idealists ; Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative History of Philosophy ; The Unity of Reason ; and Slow Fire: Jewish Notes from Berlin . Samuel Clowes Huneke is an assistant professor of history at George Mason University, focusing on modern Germany and the history of sexuality, and the author of States of Liberation: Gay Men Between Dictatorship and Democracy in Cold War Germany (2022).The 103 third parties who use cookies on this service do so for their purposes of displaying and measuring personalized ads, generating audience insights, and developing and improving products. Editor-in-Chief Michelle Chihara speaks with author Naomi Klein about her new book,“Doppelganger: A Trip into the Mirror World. At several points, Neiman mocks other thinkers as “childish,” as lacking the “everyday wisdom we expect grownups to have. Neiman sets her sights on Foucault as an exemplar of this turn away from Enlightenment reason, arguing that he pioneered a worldview held today by “the woke left. Neiman suggests that Michel Foucault, one of the few thinkers with whom she engages substantively, was merely a “nihilist” who needed “an introductory course in logic.

Such confusion between normative and descriptive claims (another legacy of Foucault) are hard to swallow for Neiman, for whom ‘there’s no deeper difference between left and right than the idea that progress is possible.Richard Wolin’s 2023 book, Heidegger in Ruins , stands as an illustrative example, deftly tying together the evidence of Heidegger’s malign influence on some parts of leftist thinking; Neiman’s book does not. g. the work of Malcom Ferdinand and Romy Oppermann), are they de facto “woke” or are they genuinely of the left? Another thesis of Neiman’s book that runs alongside her thin genealogical argument is the idea that the “woke” reject the Enlightenment principle of universalism and thus cannot be truly leftist.

Why a critique of evolutionary psychology is present in the manuscript is baffling, as the most well-known defenders of evolutionary psychology, such as Steven Pinker and Richard Dawkins, are well known for their anti-woke stances. Unfortunately for the reader, Neiman does not provide examples of these alleged “woke” individuals going beyond the boundaries of acceptability, nor does she explain how these unnamed actions are unacceptable. In her reading, sociobiology suggests inequalities of class and gender are inherent in our DNA, rather than socially constructed. Neiman’s digression to “woke” victimhood leads to another critique, the one time she substantially engages with another philosopher: a critique of Miranda Fricker’s work on standpoint epistemology.mean that the book is largely indistinguishable from similar titles flooding the “anti-woke” market such as Helen Pluckrose and James Lindsay’s Cynical Theories (2020). This discussion of sociobiology is somewhat mystifying, as she makes no direct connection between it and “woke” politics. The author's grasp of economics is also limited - she likes Piketty, misunderstands the idea of human capital, and has nothing but abuse for 'neoliberalism' while conveying no picture at all about how she envisages the world as functioning, in terms of economics or sociology, to deliver the kinds of outcomes that she favours. One could therefore assume that the term ‘woke’ describes nothing more than the perennial fears of conservatives for a future of human liberation – that ‘woke’ is, in fact, simply the latest shorthand encompassing general leftist principles. the conclusion that, because the historical record is rife with crimes against humanity, then all history is criminal.