Algebraic Topology

Product Information

Now it is true that he doesn't assume too much background in abstract algebra (knowing the basics of groups, rings, and modules is more than sufficient). This emphasis also illustrates the book's general slant towards geometric, rather than algebraic, aspects of the subject.

BibTeX key MR1867354 entry type book address Cambridge year 2002 pages xii+544 publisher Cambridge University Press mrreviewer Donald W. The readership of the n-Lab is not restricted to Algebraic Topologists of course, but the above list of notes would be useful to have readily available. Homotopy theory in particular has undergone a complete transformation and explosive expansion since Whitehead wrote his book. It has a lot of stuff, including one of the nicer introductions to spectral sequences (although I don't know a single book that does this well. Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response.I just wanted to add that I learned a big part of what I know about homology, cohomology and homotopy theory from Hatchers book and I think that that part of the book is a great source for that. It's nearly impossible to find anywhere now and if a copy is available,I'm sure it'll cost a king's ransom. The four main chapters present the basics: fundamental group and covering spaces, homology and cohomology, higher homotopy groups, and homotopy theory generally. There is a recent beautiful textbook that's a very good addition to the literature, Davis and Kirk's Lectures in Algebraic Topology - but most of the material in that book is pre-1980 and focuses on the geometric aspects of the subject. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others.

If you are willing to take many small, some medium and a few very substantial details on faith, you will find Hatcher an agreeable fellow to hang out with in the pub and talk beer-coaster mathematics, you will be happy taking a picture as a proof, and you will have no qualms with tossing around words like "attach", "collapse", "twist", "embed", "identify", "glue" and so on as if making macaroni art. So put on your big boy pants and stop wasting your time looking into lesser books hoping they will be easier to understand. I feel that I should add my own answer here, now that I am more or less done reading homotopy and homology from Hatcher's text. We put forward an alternative approach in which, rather than summing over bulk geometries, one gauges a one-form global symmetry of the bulk theory.

Most purchases from business sellers are protected by the Consumer Contract Regulations 2013 which give you the right to cancel the purchase within 14 days after the day you receive the item. Over the last two decades, topological data analysis (TDA) has emerged as a very powerful data analytic approach that can deal with various data modalities of varying complexities. It is perhaps not perfectly edited, but seems to essential reading as a source for modern unstable homotopy theory. You can change your choices at any time by visiting Cookie preferences, as described in the Cookie notice. I'll list a couple I know about (I attended some of these courses), and I'll wiki this answer so people can add more.

There are many possibilities out there, but a good one for beginners is Lee's Introduction to Topological Manifolds. The only thing that comes to mind that might be controversial is the usage of Delta complexes, which I’ve heard is seldom used elsewhere and doesn’t do much to simplify material. Coming to the book, this is great starting point for Algebraic Topology if you know Point set Topology ( because he assumes that the reader knows Quotient Topology). In the example where mapping cylinders were introduced, we were taking a map from the boundary of a "thick" letter to the underlying "thin" letter.

No doubt, a very devoted and experienced teacher has been at work here, very much so to the benefit of beginners in the field of algebraic topology, instructors, and interested readers in general. One of the most commonly used tools in TDA is persistent homology (PH), which can extract topological properties from data at various scales. A unique feature of the book is the inclusion of many optional topics which are not usually part of a first course due to time constraints, and for which elementary expositions are sometimes hard to find. In most major universities one of the three or four basic first year graduate mathematics courses is algebraic topology.

Long story short I think once you have learned the contents of Chapters 0 and 1 in Hatcher from some source, you can just read the rest of it. To clarify, this is not a rant against the book for the heck of it: I really want to try and read this book. May is one of the Gods of the subject and anyone interested in topology owes it to themselves to read his papers and books.His beautiful concise course is a classic for good reason; we so rarely have an expert give us his "take" on a field. If your background in general topology is sufficiently strong, you can go straight to Chapter 5 on cell complexes (in the second edition, the focus is on CW complexes) and work on from there. So, as a follow-up to first-year algebraic topology - still far from the cutting edge, but very relevant to reaching it - may I recommend reading some of the classic papers of the mid-twentieth century? Like I said earlier: one year of algebra won't necessarily prepare you for these routine abuses by the pros; you'll need two, or else tons of free time.