Carte Europe 2023 Michelin

Product Information

The UK is not the only country to which EU legislation selectively applies, but – with exceptions in four key areas – it is the member state with the most opt-outs.

Here responses may indicate the broad ideological orientations of the respondents (pro-market or socially oriented), but they may also evoke support (when the first option is chosen) for the original and pre-eminent purpose of European integration (the creation of a broader market) versus a preference (with the second option) for extending to the EU what has been the dominant focus of national welfare states (i. b) The Auctioneer shall not be responsible for damage to or the loss, theft, or destruction of any goods not so insured because of the seller's written instructions whether caused by negligence or otherwise. The second consideration has to do with the ‘compound’ nature of European citizenship, which is closely connected to the way the European polity has been shaped by the process of integration. Our data confirm indeed that the supranational community has also generated some feelings of affection: a very large majority within national elites declare being attached to Europe. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average.We may then ask whether feelings of belonging to one’s own country and to Europe are compatible or conflictual. Citizenship is viewed as a multifaceted phenomenon related to both the political identity of a community and the rights, entitlements, and duties that pertain to its citizens. To help us with this matter, there are a number of questions in the IntUne survey that can provide detailed information about how national elites would prefer to allocate some of the crucial policy fields between the different levels of authority existing in Europe. This chapter was discussed and written jointly, but Russo was particularly responsible for subsections on ‘The Nature of the EU Citizenship’ and ‘Threats to European Cohesion’, and for the main section on ‘A More Synthetic Presentation of Elite Positions’.

shows that respondents feel EU cohesion is challenged by at least two broad phenomena: on one side, by the emergence of cultural differences (immigration and enlargement), and on the other, by a series of apparently different aspects (economic and social differences among members, the effects of globalization, and the special relation of some members with the ‘capitalist’ USA) that are probably related in a latent way to the defence of a ‘European special model’ of a welfare state. Indeed, it can be said that the European supranational community was a ‘policy driven polity’ from its initial conception.With questions and answers about the goals and scope of the European Union, we have started to deal with the vertical dimension of citizenship, which defines what citizens are entitled to expect from public authorities. It is therefore relevant to ask whether the positive instrumental evaluation of the EU is matched by feelings of attachment to this community; and if so, how this compares to the levels of attachment to other political communities, such as those at the national or regional level. per cent) is twice as big as that of those who give a negative evaluation of the benefits of integration.

On the basis of the different elements of identity proposed to the interviewees, national elites define one scale of importance for the national level and another one for the European level rather clearly (Table 2. The other threats mentioned, which are linked to external factors, were important for a more limited number of politicians.Since 1999, Europosters has been one of the top sellers of posters, wall art prints and licensed merchandise gifts in the Czech Republic and throughout Europe too. It also guarantees extraordinary archival properties, meeting the highest industry standards regarding density, colour gamut, colour graduation and image sharpness. Most member states operate systems of civil law, whereas the UK and Ireland have common law systems, which grant more power to judicial precedents and interpretations.

At least in Europe, national polities are by now ‘mature products’ and for them not much is to be expected in terms of future political growth (in fact for some of them the future seems even to harbour some degree of deconstruction). Lots will always be bought as cheaply as is allowed by other bids and such reserves as are on our books.The IntUne survey enables us to explore the attitudes of national elites with regard to the more general purpose of the EU, as well as to some specific policy competencies. As might be expected given the strong international orientation of the largest firms, economic elites are somewhat less strongly attached to their country and region than political elites. In the previous section, we have shown that national elites are almost unanimously convinced of the benefits of European integration for their countries, that they show a broad (but not always very warm) attachment to the supranational polity, and that they predominantly express support for continuing the process of integration. In particular we need to decide whether their point of view should be considered as that of ‘external observers’ or of more ‘internal participants’. The nature of the threats perceived by national elites as more significant suggests a greater preoccupation with the internal problems of the European polity and for its lack of homogeneity than for its external role and its relationship with other international actors.