PURITO Daily Go-To Sunscreen 60ml / 2.02 fl.oz. SPF 50+ PA ++++ safe ingredients, UVA/UVB protection, broad-spectrum, calm, soothing

Product Information

In the Purito sunscreen there are two filters, and some “science-based” bloggers have said that these two filters could not possibly give you a broad spectrum sunscreen, claiming there’s a dip in the UVA2 region because the two filters have peaks in the UVB and UVA1 regions:

Daily Go-To Sunscreen - PURITO

In late 2015, Choice magazine tested six SPF 50+ sunscreens that were available in Australia, and they found that only two of the sunscreens in the consumer tests actually met the label claim. Water, Butyloctyl Salicylate (Skin-Conditioning Agents), Dibutyl Adipate (Plasticizer), Propanediol (Skin-Conditioning Agents), Butylene Glycol (Skin-Conditioning Agents), Behenyl Alcohol (Emulsion Stabilizer), Poly C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate (Emulsion Stabilizer), Polyglyceryl-3 Methylglucose Distearate (Emulsifying Agent), I think this idea comes from the observation that a lot of the sunscreens on the market with high SPF do have a lot of different filters. But having multiple filters in there doesn’t mean you actually need to have multiple filters in there to get a higher SPF. There are a lot of other explanations for why sunscreens often end up with multiple filters…In the month-plus since INCIDecoder’s blog post, Purito, Klairs, and Keep Cool have taken action. Here is what each brand has done in response to the controversy: Purito

PURITO Daily Go-To Sunscreen 60ml / 2.02 fl.oz. SPF 50+ PA

Persistent Pigment Darkening tests use UVA radiation to cause a persistent darkening of the skin, which is tanning. alpha-bisabolol (Skin-Conditioning Agent), Panthenol (Skin-Conditioning Agent), Caprylhydroxamic Acid (Chelating Agent), Centella Asiatica Extract (Skin-Conditioning Agent), US sunscreens have been tested the most by consumer groups, but US sunscreens have lots of problems. They use the older filters that aren’t as stable in the sun, they have a lower requirement for broad spectrum, and the filters tend to be more allergenic and irritating.Unless you’re testing every tube of sunscreen that you use on a panel of people, there is no way to be absolutely sure that the rating you’re getting is the rating on the label – just like you can never guarantee that your frozen berries don’t have hepatitis A, and that your car doesn’t have lethal airbags. The differences between the SPFs that different labs get has always been a really big issue. Testing bias There are always new SPF boosting technologies coming out on the market and I’m not that knowledgeable about sunscreens, but here are two that I do know a bit about: