The Straw Men: Book 1 (The Straw Men Trilogy)

Product Information

jaar geleden las ik Stromannen, het eerste deel in deel in deze serie, en beleefde er veel plezier aan. Knowing how to disarm a straw man is an important critical thinking skill. It involves describing the difference between the real thing and the misrepresentation of it. In other words, disarming a straw man has two components:

A straw man argument is constructed by presenting an opposing position as a warped, extreme version of itself. There are a few different ways an individual might turn a reasonable argument into a straw man: We have FBI agent, Nina, and John Zandt on one case, and Ward Hopkins--accompanied by friend and CIA agent Bobby Nygard--trying to unravel the deepening mystery behind the sudden death of Ward's parents. The depths of conspiracy this novel goes through are breathtaking. "It's not monsters we're afraid of. Monsters were only a comforting fantasy. We know what our own kind is capable of. What we're frightened of is ourselves."Luther, Martin (1520). "De captivitate ecclesiae babylonica" (online text based on Weimar Edition, vol. 6, p. 497). martinluther.dk. Ricardt Riis. p.section 15. Many people watching the debate were moved by what Harris said. The problem is that her remarks to Biden committed a logical fallacy. Ward Hopkins, ex CIA agent, is a man with a secret past, and he is determined to confront the murderers of his parents and trace the whereabouts is his lost brother Paul “The Upright Man” a deranged serial killer. His parents had been murdered by a group that his father had belonged to 35 years earlier...”the Straw Men, and believed themselves the only portion of humanity uninfected by a virus promoting social conscience above the cold-hearted individualism they believed inherent to our species. Whether they genuinely thought this, or it was just a convenient cover for acts of violence and depravity, was not clear.”

So what happened towards the end that took me from enjoying a LOT to enjoying it quite a bit? Well, the novel fell into that cliched, shoot-em-up rescue climax, which, as a reader, really doesn't do a whole lot for me. I know the nature of closing off a story such as this has to have the ending it does; it's inevitable. I put up with it because I was so captivated by the story and his writing. Michael Marshall is a clever writer. His prose is tight and he makes use of metaphoric language without going overboard. In just a few sentences, he can make the reader connect and understand a character, so that if that character dies later on, you mourn them.

Word History

This is a beautifully crafted story. One part leading to another to another a bit like Russian dolls - as Ward moves ever closer to learning the truth about his life, so John perhaps moves further away from himself and his own conscience....the terrible things they both face draw them together but also tear them apart. The mystery itself is well imagined - Serial Killer Thriller? Yes. And No. Or maybe. You decide. Certainly the author has created a rich mythology here - using real life events that we will all recognise he has woven an intricate tale and its extremely clever. Ward's growing incredulity at what he is discovering will mirror your own as reader and looker on of events as they unfold. The supporting cast all do their bit - but its Ward and John that will interest you. And perhaps The Upright Man....

You can’t help but wonder what he’ll give up, though without the numbers he’ll certainly be dropping his trousers! As an aside, do people still use that phrase any more? Having written it down it doesn’t seem all that PC. Ah well, life can sometimes be that way.As he begins to investigate his own past Ward finds himself drawn into the shadowy, sinister world of the Straw Men – and into the desperate race to find Sarah, before her time runs out. In countering a straw man fallacy, try to present your position as clearly and definitively as you can. Straw Man vs Steel Man Ward's brother was broken out for a reason. The Straw Men are planning something new and terrible. And only Ward, Nina and John stand against the Upright Man and his terrifying allies. Like many Hollywood inspired serial killer stories, this one ends not only in an explosive, spectacular fashion but also in an ambiguous, open-ended way. I might consider reading the sequels, even as the first one can be read as a stand-alone. Person 2: Your restaurant discriminates against families with kids. Straw man argument FAQs What is a straw man argument?

Let’s start with the deputy leader role. I’m going to assume that such is Luxon’s lust for the leader’s role that the top job isn’t available. Although no doubt Winston, who’s held pretty much every other position, might like to float it as a strawman to the strawman. When you’re actively being misrepresented by a straw man, stay calm and try to avoid straw-manning your opponent in return or letting your argument devolve into other fallacies, like the tu quoque fallacy (wherein you accuse your opponent of the same wrongdoing you yourself are accused of). Regardless of what you’re responding to, using fallacies in your discourse only undermines your position. Here are more effective ways to counter a straw man argument: There are a few plot-holes but since this is a series I guess my queries will be answered in the next books. But even as a stand-alone The Straw Men will put you on the edge and make you rethink about every crime, every massacre, every natural disaster and every plague that threatened human lives and wonder if there was not any inherent motive to all of it.Vol goede moed begon ik aan deel 2 - Het oudste offer, maar deze keer was de ervaring heel wat minder. Of het nu lag aan de lange tijdspanne tussen beide boeken, of dat de verwachtingen te hooggespannen waren, kan ik jammer genoeg niet bevestigen, maar Het oudste offer geeft de eerst honderden bladzijden veelal losse gebeurtenissen, die niet spannend genoeg zijn om de lezer geïnteresseerd te houden. Vergelijk het met een puzzel die je opent uit over tafel uitstrooit: veel fragmentjes; weinig samenhang. In tegenstelling tot die puzzel waarbij je er snel in slaagt opvallende delen samen te brengen en zo het gevoel krijgt progressie te maken, kan je bij het lezen enkel maar ondergaan - jezelf afvragend waar dit naartoe gaat - en wachten tot de auteur de eerste links vrijgeeft. Dit gebeurt pas rond blz 275 of voorbij de 75% van het boek. Vermoedelijk zullen veel lezers dit niet meemaken omdat ze al eerder afhaken. There are a number of ways you can deal with slippery slope arguments especially when you suspect these are fallacious: